Tracking and monitoring police force on field duty
Most of the time being a police officer is not easy, they are on the road patrolling the highway gathering information, responding to an emergency call, or chasing the bad guys. Every day, they face potential dangers of being in an accident, assaulted or even killed. But nobody is complaining as these dangers come with the job. In return, they need all the support they can get. But there is one way to boost law enforcement crime-solving capability—and that is to equip them with the best technology available, including the GPS tracking. Monitoring Police force officers using T57 Personal GPS Tracker can help the police save more lives and do their job more efficiently.
Moreover, GPS technology can be used not only for tracking police officers but also for monitoring prisoners on parole. This can easily be done by letting the inmates wear a GPS device or attach it to them. You will be informed through alert notification if they violate their parole.
Monitoring police Officers and Its Benefits:
Helps in keep track of police patrolling vehicles
Monitoring Police officers involves keeping track of police vehicles. This method will improve the police’s response time by locating and directing the nearest police officer to the crime-in-progress, which can help increase arrest rates, reduce criminality, and possibly save more lives.
Protects both the officers and the public
Monitoring police officers benefits both the police officers and the public. It will protect citizens from officers who might exploit their position; on the other hand, the police are also protected from fraudulent claims.
House Arrest Monitor of criminals
The GPS technology is an effective tool that the police force applies to monitor people under house arrest or probation. From this statement, it is evident that the police force has the responsibility of monitoring people under probation in order to reduce crime and prevent them from going back to crime and criminal activities. The statement also note that the GPS technology as a modern technology enables the police force to meet its objectives in dealing with cases of probation and house. Using the GPS system to monitor people under probation and house arrest therefore reduces the cost of operation in the police department and the number of officers needed to monitor the criminals. The main objective of keeping criminals under house arrest is to reduce the cost of maintaining the same criminals in prison. The GPS technology save millions annually in law enforcement and prison expenses” (Navarro 8). Cost reduction does not only apply to the immediate operation cost that the police department and police officers pay in maintaining people on probation, but also thorough reduction of overcrowding in prisons.
As a modern technology, application of the GPS technology is in many areas especially the police force. Crime is the main objective or problem faced by the police and the police department and the police have the responsibility of preventing crime. The GPS technology enables the police to respond to crime and crime related activities more accurately and efficiently. In addition to accuracy, the GPS technology enables the police department to reduce the cost of operation and the cost they incur when handling criminal and criminal activities.
In particular, the technology makes the police efficient in their operation and outshines criminals by enabling them to have more advanced technology. Finally, the GPS technology makes police officers to be reliable witness in courts by providing them with sufficient information and details.
A police force with OUTGPS
The modern police and the GPS technology are un-separable and this statement or claim highlights the dependence of the police force on the GPS technology.
The statement also indicates that the police force is over-using this technology.(Ferraresi Azcentral) agree with this statement and goes forward to claim that officers are quickly realizing how much they need the GPS technology in their service. From this claim, Ferraresi confirms that the police force neither is over relying on the technology nor used to the technology.
The question of whether the police force can do better without the technology and what is next after this technology are controversial questions. To begin with, the police officers are professionals just as any other professional and therefore they need to build their competence. Just like any other profession, the police need to be creative in solving or carrying out their duties.
The only way the police force can acquire the necessary creativity is through practice and experience and they can only achieve this by reducing over-reliance on technology. This implies that their over-reliance on GPS technology reduces their creativity.
Technology is not constant, it changes with time, and this applies to the GPS technology. Any change in the technology makes the previous knowledge that the police had on the technology irrelevant and they waste unnecessary recourses and time to study the new ideas.
Changes in the GPS technology can also be directly against the police force and their operation. An example of this can occur in a situation where criminals have the ability to manipulate or access the GPS system. The GPS technology exposes the police and their activities to criminals and provides them with an extra task.